Money & Power

A Blog on Banking, Finance, Law and Politics

Archive for the 'Uncategorized' Category

A Historic Election…What now?

Posted in Uncategorized on November 5th, 2008

Yesterday marked a truly historic day in American history.  America has elected its first African-American President.  Its hard to comprehend what this all really means, especially when one has little to go on to understand with any glimmer of certainty, what it is that Mr. Obama will really do.  I keep hearing from the news cycles and everyone covering the election, how moving this was and how everyone got tears in their eyes.  Well, I didn’t.  I think its great for America that we have gotten to the point where we can elect an African American to the highest office in the land. However, let’s have a little perspective.  It pains me to know that many people voted for him simply because of the color of his skin and because they thought it was time for this.  What happened to eletiong someone based on policy and record?  Oh well, now at least I don’t need to worry about personal responsibility because if something bad happens, our Government will just step in to help me.  A few thoughts going forward…

First, Obama will have to move to the center.  If he does not move to the center and control what seems to be a termpered mandate from the public, he will allow the truly Liberal Congress and Nancy Pelosi to walk all over him and overreach on policy.  I hope he will leave taxes alone, but that’s a dream.  So I just need to accept that I now get to pay more to the Government for people who just don’t care to live. 

Second, I hope for everyone on Wall Street is seeing what happened last night and I hope they have a lot saved up because they have gotten the bad rap that lawyers and lobbyists already have.  They are the ones that it has become popular to hate.  Hopefully, we will have a certered government with the foresight and knowledge to understand how not only money, but policy WILL trickle down. 

Lastly, I really hope that Obama can change things a bit in Washington, but from my perspective, things are done a certain way in Washington, and that will be VERY hard to change.  Especially when he has taken the second highest amount of contributions from lobbyists and like orgainzations in his short 3 years in the Senate.  He is and will continue to be beholden to the special interests he has undertaken with contributions and support.  This is not a mandate and it should not be taken as a landslide…Obama won 51% of the popular vote, hardly a landslide.  Mr. Obama won because there were more people who were pissed off at Republicans for their lot in life and because of race. This was not a truly ideological race, and it never was.  Good Luck Mr. Obama.  Now you get to try and convince people that you have some substance to you, and not just a good speechwriter because Iran and China don’t care about your speeches and idealistic tone…you will learn that very quickly and we will get to see how you will defend America and stand up for her.

Desperate with thirst, people will perpetually run blindly to the water in the desert without knowing that it’s a mirage.

My Response to “What a return!”

Posted in Uncategorized on October 15th, 2008

I think you are right and it seems to me that the whole issue of why they are doing this is twofold:

1. They are trying to protect the taxpayers, too bad the taxpayers (who are only 60-70% of the people living in this country) don’t understand that they are being as protected as they could be, and that this will allow joe six pack to get a loan for a car, house, home improvements, etc.
 
2. Treasury wants to encourage banks to lend responsibly again and fast in order to turn their balance sheets around.  There is also a redemption provision whereby the banks engaging in the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or “TARP”, can redeem the senior preferred shares of Treasury with other good Tier 1 Capital offerings.

This, I think encourages these banks to get into the program if they need to and also to get out as fast as possible because there are also crappy exec comp rules associated with being in the program, like only being able to deduct for tax purposes, the first $500k of the CEO, CFO and top 3 exec salaries, and strict scrutiny of the golden parachute programs.

It is by no means a perfect program, but there are incentives to get into it, to open up lending, halt the crisis, and get out to carry on with business. It will be some time before we see how things work out, but it is unfortunate that Paulson won’t be around to oversee the program past January.

There is a fine line between insanity and pure genius, this may be one example of it.

What a return!

Posted in Uncategorized on October 15th, 2008

Again, a very intelligent guest posting:

With the actions today the fed govt. “made” the 9 biggest banks in the country allow them to buy preferred shares which carry a 5% dividend (for the first 5 years, then 9% after that).  Okay, if the 2 year T-Bill is offering at around 2% - then our government just effectively ensured it is going to pay 2% on its borrowings, then turn it around for a guaranteed 5% return.  I know I may drink the kool-aid on what Paulson, Bernanke, etc. do – but, if I consider the US govt to be the largest “investment” I make yearly, through taxes, then effectively the “management” of my largest investment just guaranteed a return on capital.

Pulling out of Chicago…

Posted in Uncategorized on October 3rd, 2008

The following was sent to me and has been going around…this is amazing because being from and having lived in Chicago, I know the crap that has been going on in Chicago and Illinois for the last decade.  Enjoy…

Perhaps the U.S. should pull out of Chicago?


Body count: In the last six months (Apr.-Sept.) over 300 (murdered) in Chicago; 161 US troops killed in Iraq.
Sens. Barack Obama & Dick Durbin,
Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr.,
Gov. Rod Blogojevich,
House leader Mike Madigan,
Atty. Gen. Lisa Madigan (daughter of Mike),
Mayor Richard M. Daley (son of Mayor Richard J. Daley)
…..our leadership in Illinois…..ALL Democrats.
 
Thank you for the combat zone in Chicago. Of course, they’re all blaming each other.

 Can’t blame Republicans; there aren’t any!
State pension fund $44 Billion in debt, worst in country.
Cook County (Chicago) sales tax 10.25% highest in country. (Look ‘em up
if you want).
Chicago school system rated one of the worst in the country.
This is the political culture that Obama comes from in Illinois……and he’s gonna ‘fix’ Washington politics for us!
Do you believe in Fairy Tales???

Back to business…

Posted in Uncategorized on September 30th, 2008

My sincere apologies for being gone from the blogosphere for the last few months, but there is much to catch up on together.  First, the Presidential race is heating up. Second, the credit crisis is claiming victory over some of Wall Street’s finest, and to top it off, Congress is sitting on its hands playing partisan politics while main street can’t catch a break in searching for some kind of certainty and reassurance that this is the United States and we will be alright.

The Presidential election.  I have my own very strong opinions on who I will be voting for this November, so I won’t bore you with all of the reasons why, but a few thoughts.  On taxes. As everyone who has ever taken an economics class knows, the worst thing you can do in an financial and economic downturn is raise taxes.  Now this is what Sen. Obama wishes to do because of all the “fat cats” on the street. I have many issues with this and economics is the most direct reason why I have never and will never vote for Obama. Obama supporters contentions are well taken and heard, but there is no way to convince me or any sane economist that raising taxes in this environment will do anything other than backfire.  As you’ve heard, our corporate tax rate is 35%, that’s the second highest in the world.  Our income tax, Obama supporters will say is only going to go up to the levels under Bill Clinton (39.6% top marginal rate).  However, this does not take into consideration the other taxes people will pay and will pay more on under an Obama disaster.  There is the payroll tax, the social security tax, and the capital gains tax, just to name a few, that would increase under an Obama administration.  Adding these up puts the tax burden at more than 50% for the top rate…I’ll let you recall history to discover why Reagan was so popular and why the US is on top of the economic world because of his administration (hint: he cut the top marginal tax rate from 70% to 28% during his administration). 

Furthermore, while Obama wants to levy this high tax only on the highest of earners (those over 250k), he fails to understand, or maybe his supporters fail to understand that there is only so much you can tax out of this 3-5% of Americans, which doesnt cover his agenda spending items…this means it will have to come out of a higher rate for middle income Americans.  Obama wants to give you a $1,000 tax break beyond the current credits, but this will be lost by the higher payroll, social security, and capital gains tax rates EVERYONE in America will be hit by. The rhetoric sounds great, but it’s all hiding the numbers.  You think wall street is bad now, wait until November 5.  If Obama is elected, I think there will be an exodus out of Egypt between November and whenever he decides to increase taxes.  There are plenty of much more lucrative opportunities elsewhere, and if the US can’t be stabilized, the focus of the World will move on. 

The Credit Crisis and Congressional Incompetence. OK, now that the Dems have held onto control of Congress for two years, we can all agree that NEITHER the Rs nor the Ds saw this coming with the force it has.  Barney Frank wants to tell everyone that the Rs had 12 years to put through GSE reform, and the Ds did it in a year and a half…OK, well as we all know, the facts and circumstances are a LOT different now. I’m not going to point the finger because very few people saw this storm coming with this magnitude.  However, I will say that being in Washington for the last year and a half, and working on legal, financial and real estate finance policy here, has been an eye-opening experience. 

There is so much that goes into seemingly simple issues and policies, that it is hard to understand it all.  This is why, as much as main street hates “Lobbyists”, I will bet you anything that Joe 6-pack couldn’t tell you in a concise, or intelligent way what a lobbyist is, what they do, or how they do it.  So every time you see an ad attacking lobbyists, remember: if you’re a union worker, there is a massive group of “lobbyists” in Washington who are advocating for YOUR rights and protection, if you are a Banker, or work for a bank, there is a massive group of lobbyists in Washington advocating on YOUR behalf so that your bank or the bank you work for has less to worry about and more money to make payroll each month to keep you employed, if you’re a teacher, a firefighter, a small business owner, those awful, despicable ”lobbyists” in Washington, are advocating for you, so get it right!

Housing and the Crisis.  There will be more on this to come, but suffice to say or now that the huge bailout plan that did not pass yesterday was needed, and some form of it will pass. But I think many Republicans and even the 95 Dems who voted against it, did so in part because of the partisan politics offered by Speaker Pelosi’s remarks before the bill was offered for a vote.  For the recod, this is an incredible breakdown in leadership and a total failure to see the big picture.  There were a lot of people who were on the fence, both parties, because their constituents were telling them one thing (don’t pass it) and their gut was probably telling them another.  First of all, as a moderate Republican, I don’t like the idea of making government bigger, especially this big.  So I can understand all the nay votes yesterday, but the great news channels, except for CNBC from what I noticed, failed to explain how the bill works.  It was pitched to many as a huge $700 billion bailout for the “fat cats” on Wall Street.  Ok, this is wrong for so many reasons it makes me sick.  First of all, Treas Secretary Paulson, only gets $250B up front, then $100B if President says ok, then the last $350B if Congress says ok.  He also has to consult with ehads of other agencies before action is taken.  So there are checks on this that will probably not let it get to $700 billion anytime soon.  Secondly, Wall Street is connected to Main Street whether the public likes it or not…that’s where your mortgage goes every month.  If some of these banks and financial institutions do not get some help to remain solvent or encouragement to lend money in this economic cycle, yes some of them brought it on themselves, but either way, YOU will feel it.  If the credit markets don’t open up, then the public who doesn’t want to “bail out” Wall Street will not get the home loan, auto loan, new credit card, or even education loan necessary to carry on.  This also means that credit will not be available to small businesses needing to borrow to PAY those working on main street. 

If something doesn’t happen, job losses will increase, credit will be more frozen than it already is, so I hope your credit score is over 700 if you want to own a home or a car.  This bill needs to pass, or there will be another 1000 taken off the Dow, after yesterday’s 777 points down, people are losing their pensions, savings, and now their banks.  This has to get done.  I would like to let the market work itself out, but there is so much scepticism and uncertainty, fueled more so by the idiotic press and media who don’t have a clue about what they’re talking about, that there will be a meltdown we have yet to comprehend.  I don’t like the big government idea, but in this situation, like when Alexander Hamilton told George Washington that there needed to be a National Bank to assume all the debt of the states and provide unity and strength for the new country, there must be something done to stabilize the financial sector.  Everything trickles down.  The US will be ok, and will survive with or without this bill and authority given to Paulson, but the issue becomes how long do we want to be in this mud and are we willing to accept the end of our reign at the top of the financial world.

 

Stay tuned, more to come…

Economic Rhetoric

Posted in Uncategorized on March 26th, 2008

The New York Times has an interesting reader’s comment section today on the homepage asking readers their thoughts on Supply Side Economics, its benefits, drawbacks, and merited claims.  My contention is that supply side economics does work and is largely responsible for much of the prosperity that America has enjoyed over the last 25 years.  I also think that the idea of taxing the rich to pay for all the lofty hopes of spending and fixing social security, medicare and medicaid are sadly misleading.  You see, not only will taxing one segment of the people lead to social, political, and not to mention economic turmoil, but you will not even come close to being able to pay for these programs.  There is simply not enough revenue to be gained by increasing taxes on the wealthiest 1%.  

By the way, please, Hilary, Obama, and even McCain, remember that many of those “individual filers” who are in the highest income bracket are really small businesses, which are responsible for roughly ONE HALF of all job creation in the US over the last two decades.  This is the greatness of America, the entrepreneurial spirit which drives people to open their own shops and have their own staff.  However, increase taxes, and you will see a drop in job creation and even closing of many small businesses who are already hurting.

Now I submit to you the idea that lowering taxes can produce economic stabilization and prosperity, for all.  Not just the wealthy, but ALL Americans.  By lowering taxes, I believe, you can lower the base, increase investment and saving (which makes it ultimately possible to privatize social security with personal accounts that will pay far better), increase job creation, and keep many of the best minds and businesses here in the United States while attracting foreign investors and businesses to the US. 

Lastly, to the NYT reader who said that “Supply side economics is nothing more than a rationale for greed”, I am sorry you feel that way because you fail to realize how much supply side economics and especially capitalism has given you.  Socialism doesn’t work because people are generally rational self-interested decision makers. Read Adam Smith and if you still feel the way you do, then go live in a socialist state, have the same amount of money and property rights as everyone else (i.e. none) and I guarantee you will find yourself getting greedy for a venti Starbucks and the NY Times travel section. 

“Greed is good”

Regulators Unite!

Posted in Uncategorized on March 12th, 2008

Yesterday, the SEC and CFTC announced an agreement that would bring the regulators ever closer together by integrating their regulatory efforts in an industry looking for innovation in products.  The regulators have designed a framework for sharing information and have established principles for regulatory review of new products that may be permitted to trade as either a commodity future or as a security, or both. 

The agreement also calls for a permanent regulatory “liason” between the two regulators, formal quarterly meetings of staff, and consultation on matters including industry M & A investigations. 

Furthermore, as the Wall Street Journal reported on it, this is an interesting agreement to be made just weeks before the Treasury Department is set to release propsed changes to the financial regulatory system in April.  

Have these agencies put aside their differences and come to an agreement that would create a more effectice and efficient regulatory model?

Is this agreement the first major step toward uiniting the two regulators?

Economic Woes

Posted in Uncategorized on March 7th, 2008

A dear friend of mine recently wrote the following to a group of us noting factual concerns with the state of the economy.  His name and others have been changed in the interest of anonymity.  Thank you.

 “Well, in light of the dreary economic reports we received today, the idea that the Fed is pumping more money in to the system and seems to be on track for an additional 75 basis point cut in the interest rates, and on the back end of President Bush’s top advisor saying we are headed towards “negative growth” (I’m guessing he was just hoping that most Americans wouldn’t associate negative growth with recession) I thought I would take 2 minutes to give my version of the state of the economy.  It is a blizzard in Cincinnati, and I needed an outlet for my recent thoughts on the economy.  To be completely honest, what I figure is that I am by far the least intelligent person on this email so I figure I would just become more enlightened with your reactions to my first grade knowledge of the economy.  Okay, so if you just lay out the “facts” as they stand before us before we digest them they are as follows (I think):
·       increased inflationary concerns
·       “negative growth” possibly for a second quarter in a row
·       a dollar that is on a seemingly endless downward spiral – to never before seen levels
·       commodities including oil, gold, wheat, etc. that – due to our dollar problems – are rising to never before seen levels 
·       we are shedding jobs – maybe shedding isn’t the right term to use – but today’s jobs reports didn’t help
·       decreasing wages for factory workers
·       increasing exports (due to the dollar problems)
·       the US is still operating in a trade deficit
·       we can’t seem to even rely on municipal bonds to trade appropriately – and an $800m in revenue company - Ambac – (very much considered a small company) – is controlling the stock market and the fate of the world’s economy.  Since when did the fact that a company of that size secured $1.5b in capital become “big news”?  I understand the idea of the purpose they serve, but do they really serve as the “backbone” of our economy.
·       The S&P 500 is down almost 11% in the current year
·       A credit crunch that is causing financial institutions to take enormous write-downs (mainly due to Sarbanes-Oxley)
So, what does all of this mean (this is what I am relying on you for).  Here is my basic understanding of what this means to us:
·       Well, lets see – on the surface a weak dollar will increase our exports which will effectively increase demand for our products, causing a shift right in the demand curve.  Combined with lower wages, this is a boon to manufacturing.  But wait, oil and commodities are increasing at an intense rate – which would certainly offset the decrease in wages – and possibly raise input prices overall – causing a shift left in the supply curve.
o       If I understand that correctly, if you factor in the shift right in the demand curve and a shift left in the supply curve – you effectively produce the same quantity at a higher price – is that right?  I guess that leads to the inflation problem we are currently seeing
·       Given our current inflation problems and the weakening dollar – is it the right thing to do to be lowering the interest rates and pumping money in to the system?  I don’t know much, but I thought lower rates, more capital would continue to decrease the value of the dollar and push inflation even higher.  Can we not just freeze the interest rates and ride this out and see where we go from here.  I heard an unbelievable line today from my favorite new TV personality – Larry Kudlow – “monetary policy is like sex – the initial few moments of the act are extremely exciting, but the full effects and backlash will not be felt for another nine months”.  I realize one of the points of lowering the rates is to encourage more lending, and hopefully more spending in the economy.  I think also, the hope is this will trickle down to the housing sector problem – causing lower mortgage rates – however as we have seen, the mortgage rates are not falling, nor are they tied to, the fed funds rate.  While they fell this week – last week they were at four month highs.  Banks have reversed fields and instead of being predatory lenders they have become very picky about who they lend to and at what rates.  So, I ask you, why are we continuing to lower the rates in the face of inflationary concerns and a weaker dollar.  I read that the only thing keeping the dollar viable is that it is the basis for 80% of the daily transactions around the world – if it weren’t for this, we would be the peso.
·       My final question/point before I end this worthless dissertation – is simply to say that I fully understand that the stagflation problems of prior decades were much different and much worse than what we are facing today.  The recession was worse, inflation was much worse – it was a different time.  But, each day I start to hear more and more that makes me feel like we are experiencing “minor stagflation” – I mean truthfully, we are now officially showing negative economic growth and high inflationary concerns.  Is this a bigger issue than people are making it? 
I will end with another fantastic quote I heard, made famous by Ronald Reagen, when discussing the release of poor economic reports:  “You’ve shown me the manure….now where is the horse.”

My comments follow in the attached comments to this post…