<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Money &amp; Power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moneypower.politicalbear.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moneypower.politicalbear.com</link>
	<description>A Blog on Banking, Finance, Law and Politics</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on A Historic Election&#8230;What now? by autocarsinsurance.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Historic Election…What now?</title>
		<link>http://moneypower.politicalbear.com/2008/11/05/a-historic-electionwhat-now/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>autocarsinsurance.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Historic Election…What now?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 14:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneypower.politicalbear.com/?p=37#comment-11</guid>
		<description>[...] Yesterday marked a truly historic day in American history. America has elected its first African-American President. Its hard to comprehend what this all really means, especially when one has little to go on to understand with any .. Read more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yesterday marked a truly historic day in American history. America has elected its first African-American President. Its hard to comprehend what this all really means, especially when one has little to go on to understand with any .. Read more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What a return! by admin</title>
		<link>http://moneypower.politicalbear.com/2008/10/15/what-a-return/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneypower.politicalbear.com/?p=32#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Will you work this one out a little further? I follow you but barely, and I think it is a message that is important to discussions about the bailout plans and the possible outcomes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will you work this one out a little further? I follow you but barely, and I think it is a message that is important to discussions about the bailout plans and the possible outcomes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Back to business&#8230; by Fat Cat on Wall Street</title>
		<link>http://moneypower.politicalbear.com/2008/09/30/back-to-business/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Fat Cat on Wall Street</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 04:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneypower.politicalbear.com/?p=8#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Next time leave something for us to say - that pretty much nailed it.  I know maybe Paulson wasn't the guy to deliver this package to "main street" or "Joe Six Pack", but the beating he has taken has been undeserved.  Tell me one other person more qualified, or with the surrounding team he has to handle this problem.  I'm not a big government guy, but I had to be reluctantly in favor of the bail-out.  Now, I am just hoping the Amerian public has the paitence to let the combination of that program, the market forces, and other programs work themselves out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next time leave something for us to say - that pretty much nailed it.  I know maybe Paulson wasn&#8217;t the guy to deliver this package to &#8220;main street&#8221; or &#8220;Joe Six Pack&#8221;, but the beating he has taken has been undeserved.  Tell me one other person more qualified, or with the surrounding team he has to handle this problem.  I&#8217;m not a big government guy, but I had to be reluctantly in favor of the bail-out.  Now, I am just hoping the Amerian public has the paitence to let the combination of that program, the market forces, and other programs work themselves out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Back to business&#8230; by admin</title>
		<link>http://moneypower.politicalbear.com/2008/09/30/back-to-business/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 19:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneypower.politicalbear.com/?p=8#comment-8</guid>
		<description>I just can't believe that he gets away the fact that he is raising taxes on small businesses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just can&#8217;t believe that he gets away the fact that he is raising taxes on small businesses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Back to business&#8230; by jesilvia</title>
		<link>http://moneypower.politicalbear.com/2008/09/30/back-to-business/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>jesilvia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 18:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneypower.politicalbear.com/?p=8#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Yes, you are quite correct, MANY small businesses will get hit with the higher taxes. Great to be back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you are quite correct, MANY small businesses will get hit with the higher taxes. Great to be back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Back to business&#8230; by admin</title>
		<link>http://moneypower.politicalbear.com/2008/09/30/back-to-business/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 18:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneypower.politicalbear.com/?p=8#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Now that is a return!

Regarding only taxing the top earners, doesn't that also cover the smallest of small businesses?

Anyways, great to have you back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that is a return!</p>
<p>Regarding only taxing the top earners, doesn&#8217;t that also cover the smallest of small businesses?</p>
<p>Anyways, great to have you back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Regulators Unite! by admin</title>
		<link>http://moneypower.politicalbear.com/2008/03/12/regulators-unite/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneypower.politicalbear.com/2008/03/12/regulators-unite/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>I thought that the Director of National Inteligence had a pretty good gig.  This will be a powerful position....or go the way of the DNI.  It will be interesting to follow how this develops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought that the Director of National Inteligence had a pretty good gig.  This will be a powerful position&#8230;.or go the way of the DNI.  It will be interesting to follow how this develops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Economic Woes by admin</title>
		<link>http://moneypower.politicalbear.com/2008/03/07/economic-woes/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 22:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneypower.politicalbear.com/2008/03/07/economic-woes/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>I know the economy is looking bad, but I have to question some of your points.

*the dollar is in a seamingly endless downward spiral?

Well, I think we could all sit and figure out its end, it will stop around its true valuation.  A drop like this is just a reset.  

*commodity prices rising because of weak dollar?

If commodities are rising a weak dollar is not the main reason.  Ethanol, oil costs, horrible federal agriculture policy, and increased world demand are just a few of the larger explanations.

*decreasing wages for factory workers?

While on a micro scale this might be talking point, I don't understand its relevance in a macro evaluation.  Factory wages have been over inflated for years (that is why foreign companies have become more competitive), and in an evolving  economy isn't this necessary?

*Last question: Still operating in trade deficit?

Yes. But that doesn't add to your point.  It actually points opposite of your facts regarding the weak dollar. 

All of this to say, great letter.  I know I question some points, but if everybody thought as much about the economy as this.......I might feel less uncertain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know the economy is looking bad, but I have to question some of your points.</p>
<p>*the dollar is in a seamingly endless downward spiral?</p>
<p>Well, I think we could all sit and figure out its end, it will stop around its true valuation.  A drop like this is just a reset.  </p>
<p>*commodity prices rising because of weak dollar?</p>
<p>If commodities are rising a weak dollar is not the main reason.  Ethanol, oil costs, horrible federal agriculture policy, and increased world demand are just a few of the larger explanations.</p>
<p>*decreasing wages for factory workers?</p>
<p>While on a micro scale this might be talking point, I don&#8217;t understand its relevance in a macro evaluation.  Factory wages have been over inflated for years (that is why foreign companies have become more competitive), and in an evolving  economy isn&#8217;t this necessary?</p>
<p>*Last question: Still operating in trade deficit?</p>
<p>Yes. But that doesn&#8217;t add to your point.  It actually points opposite of your facts regarding the weak dollar. </p>
<p>All of this to say, great letter.  I know I question some points, but if everybody thought as much about the economy as this&#8230;&#8230;.I might feel less uncertain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Economic Woes by jesilvia</title>
		<link>http://moneypower.politicalbear.com/2008/03/07/economic-woes/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>jesilvia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 21:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneypower.politicalbear.com/2008/03/07/economic-woes/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>On the CEO compensation note, let me just say that Congress will effectively
make some new rule or regulation that will once again confirm my
desire NOT to be CEO or CFO of a publicly-traded company.  I know I am
just one of many ambitious young individuals like y'all who have
crossed that off the list of long-term goals because, for as much as I
read and study the financial markets, which is all i effing do, there
is just no upside to getting crapped on constantly as the leader of a
publicly-traded corporation.  I would rather be a trader or I-banker
on the street, make a lot of money (and not by screwing the
institution paying me to gamble with other people's money all day
long, thank you Jerome) and have all the same toys without ever
worrying whether I signed for someone elses work when there is simply
no way for me to efficiently verify the merits of the work in any
cost-conscious way.  I swear this is the short email I will produce in
response to your commentary.  So, in that vein, I will digress
until I am able to consider how best to respond in a concise manner to
y'all.  Let's put this out there, I think that we can all agree that
much of the "action" on and off the street in the past few weeks can
be attributed to one word....uncertainty.

This is what I will base my forthcoming conculsions on.  The
uncertainty surrounding Congressional action in lieu of the subprime
fallout; uncertainty in terms of the institutions being able to
withstand margin calls left and right and no doubt the wave of work
the plaintiffs bar will be egaging in, and already is as suits against
almost every major financial institution have been initiated;
uncertainty in the Fed's action, which will presumably be more
dramatic given the crap numbers that have recently come out
(recession); uncertainty in the markets given that what was an 80%
chance of having a Dem in the whitehouse in 2009 is now 60%, still more
than likely; the almost certainty that the taxcuts will expire as they
are set to in the new term because no matter what there will be a MORE
democratic Congress in place, and the taxes may actually increase
after the cuts expire...really smart Hil-Bama to raise taxes in a
slowed economy.

Yes, go ahead Hil-Bama, screw with the taxes and watch more corporations
and jobs go overseas, screw with NAFTA, which took 9 years to negotiate,
and you can really kiss all those OHIO manufacturing jobs goodbye,
mandate social security and screw the young people who don't need to
pay high insurance bills right now because they are healthy, but will
if theres a mandate (that's us), and take corporate profits, they
don't need them, especially the pharmaceutical industry because its
actually cheap to research and develop new life saving drugs (I think
we know how much it costs these companies to get one working drug
through the FDA.)

So, in conclusion, for now, suffice it to say that the word of the day is uncertainty. Everything is being priced in for the future,
as per Larry Kudlow's comment, 9 months out, when the election is
over, when the recession fallout is taking place and litigation
expenses are throught the roof, when the Fed figures out what the hell
they're doing (notice the pop in the market this morning despite the
crap jobs number because the realization that the Fed will go more
than 50 points in the near term), and when Americans wake up the day
after the election in November and (most likely) say to themselves, "What just happened?"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the CEO compensation note, let me just say that Congress will effectively<br />
make some new rule or regulation that will once again confirm my<br />
desire NOT to be CEO or CFO of a publicly-traded company.  I know I am<br />
just one of many ambitious young individuals like y&#8217;all who have<br />
crossed that off the list of long-term goals because, for as much as I<br />
read and study the financial markets, which is all i effing do, there<br />
is just no upside to getting crapped on constantly as the leader of a<br />
publicly-traded corporation.  I would rather be a trader or I-banker<br />
on the street, make a lot of money (and not by screwing the<br />
institution paying me to gamble with other people&#8217;s money all day<br />
long, thank you Jerome) and have all the same toys without ever<br />
worrying whether I signed for someone elses work when there is simply<br />
no way for me to efficiently verify the merits of the work in any<br />
cost-conscious way.  I swear this is the short email I will produce in<br />
response to your commentary.  So, in that vein, I will digress<br />
until I am able to consider how best to respond in a concise manner to<br />
y&#8217;all.  Let&#8217;s put this out there, I think that we can all agree that<br />
much of the &#8220;action&#8221; on and off the street in the past few weeks can<br />
be attributed to one word&#8230;.uncertainty.</p>
<p>This is what I will base my forthcoming conculsions on.  The<br />
uncertainty surrounding Congressional action in lieu of the subprime<br />
fallout; uncertainty in terms of the institutions being able to<br />
withstand margin calls left and right and no doubt the wave of work<br />
the plaintiffs bar will be egaging in, and already is as suits against<br />
almost every major financial institution have been initiated;<br />
uncertainty in the Fed&#8217;s action, which will presumably be more<br />
dramatic given the crap numbers that have recently come out<br />
(recession); uncertainty in the markets given that what was an 80%<br />
chance of having a Dem in the whitehouse in 2009 is now 60%, still more<br />
than likely; the almost certainty that the taxcuts will expire as they<br />
are set to in the new term because no matter what there will be a MORE<br />
democratic Congress in place, and the taxes may actually increase<br />
after the cuts expire&#8230;really smart Hil-Bama to raise taxes in a<br />
slowed economy.</p>
<p>Yes, go ahead Hil-Bama, screw with the taxes and watch more corporations<br />
and jobs go overseas, screw with NAFTA, which took 9 years to negotiate,<br />
and you can really kiss all those OHIO manufacturing jobs goodbye,<br />
mandate social security and screw the young people who don&#8217;t need to<br />
pay high insurance bills right now because they are healthy, but will<br />
if theres a mandate (that&#8217;s us), and take corporate profits, they<br />
don&#8217;t need them, especially the pharmaceutical industry because its<br />
actually cheap to research and develop new life saving drugs (I think<br />
we know how much it costs these companies to get one working drug<br />
through the FDA.)</p>
<p>So, in conclusion, for now, suffice it to say that the word of the day is uncertainty. Everything is being priced in for the future,<br />
as per Larry Kudlow&#8217;s comment, 9 months out, when the election is<br />
over, when the recession fallout is taking place and litigation<br />
expenses are throught the roof, when the Fed figures out what the hell<br />
they&#8217;re doing (notice the pop in the market this morning despite the<br />
crap jobs number because the realization that the Fed will go more<br />
than 50 points in the near term), and when Americans wake up the day<br />
after the election in November and (most likely) say to themselves, &#8220;What just happened?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Economic Woes by jesilvia</title>
		<link>http://moneypower.politicalbear.com/2008/03/07/economic-woes/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>jesilvia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 21:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneypower.politicalbear.com/2008/03/07/economic-woes/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I am encouraged by your commentary and your recollection of facts and
relevant issues that must be addressed.  I will add my
commentary once i have had the privilege of more thoroughly reviewing
your contentions and well thought out questions; I love this stuff.  I
think my response and addition to the conversation at the current
time, an afternoon of a cold, dreary and rainy day in Washington, as
Congress once again puts its hand into something it has absolutely NO
business in, nor a clue of what is actually going on in many of these
cases, CEO Compensation, will be to note the overarching principle of
UNCERTAINTY.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am encouraged by your commentary and your recollection of facts and<br />
relevant issues that must be addressed.  I will add my<br />
commentary once i have had the privilege of more thoroughly reviewing<br />
your contentions and well thought out questions; I love this stuff.  I<br />
think my response and addition to the conversation at the current<br />
time, an afternoon of a cold, dreary and rainy day in Washington, as<br />
Congress once again puts its hand into something it has absolutely NO<br />
business in, nor a clue of what is actually going on in many of these<br />
cases, CEO Compensation, will be to note the overarching principle of<br />
UNCERTAINTY.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
